COLUMBIA (AP) - At its first-ever oral argument via teleconference, the South Carolina Supreme Court heard concerns about potential difficulties of voting in this year's elections due to the coronavirus outbreak, as social distancing recommendations remain in place.
"This is our maiden voyage if you will, and thank you for participating," Chief Justice Don Beatty said to open Tuesday's session. "This court has been a bit of a hot bench over the years, but we're going to cool it off a little bit."
Last month, two lawsuits were filed in state and federal courts asking judges to require South Carolina to relax rules on absentee voting for the June 9 statewide primary.
Absentee voters currently must fall under certain requirements such as being disabled, unable to get to the polls because of work, out of state or over age 65. Ballots also must be signed by a witness. The lawsuits said absentee rules don't include isolating from a pandemic, which also could be a problem with the witness requirement.
In a March letter to state lawmakers and Gov. Henry McMaster, South Carolina Election Commission Executive Director Marci Andino backed no-excuse absentee voting and expressed safety concerns about in-person voting, noting that many poll managers fall into high-risk categories for COVID-19.
McMaster has said he has no plans to delay the primaries. Saying state lawmakers would need to agree to change absentee voting requirements, McMaster has said he would support any such measure.
In the state lawsuit, Bruce Spiva, attorney for the South Carolina Democratic Party and the national Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, noted that his clients are seeking relief for the June primary, as well as the general election in November, unless there were to be some "drastic change" with regard to preventing or treating the virus.
"This election can't be free and open, your honor, under the circumstances that we are living under today," Spiva said.
Rob Tyson, an attorney for the state Republican Party, said Democrats across the country were trying to use the pandemic as cover for an underlying desire to inappropriately expand voting laws.
"We respectfully request that the court deny their attempt to rewrite South Carolina laws," Tyson said.
The court will issue its ruling later. Justice John Few opined as to why the court was considering the issue at all, given that state lawmakers - who could make changes to state law - were convening in Columbia as he spoke.
Other courts throughout the state have already been holding some proceedings via video conference during the outbreak. Beatty shut off public access to the Supreme Court building in mid-March and, by the end of that month, had canceled all oral arguments that were currently on the schedule.
Tuesday's arguments were slightly modified from their typical format to cut down on crosstalk during attorneys' speaking times. Arguments went relatively smoothly, with the occasional screen freezes due to connection glitches and the reminders familiar to many new to teleconferences to unmute themselves when taking a turn to speak.
Clerk Dan Shearouse was dispatched to check on Justice John Kittredge after his feed cut out for a few minutes, and Kittredge later joined by phone.
There have been nearly 7,650 cases of the coronavirus confirmed in South Carolina, and 331 deaths, according to the Monday update from state public health officials.
More Articles to Read